Sierra Club
Jump to
Search Ventana Chapter All Sierra Club
Ventana Chapter  
Explore, Enjoy and Protect the Planet  
Home
Home
Politics and Issues
Schedule
Chapter Organization
Join
Resources
Contact Us
National Sierra Club
California Sierra Club
Old Baldy, Canada | photo by Cameron Schaus

Sierra Club
   Conservation Issues of the Ventana Chapter | monterey county
Judge rules Monterey County must release development documents


A judge has ordered Monterey County to release records about the controversial September Ranch subdivision in Carmel Valley-information county officials maintained wasn't public because it was held by a county consultant.

Local open government advocates, The Open Monterey Project (TOMP) and Patricia Bernardi, filed the suit, which resulted in this welcome ruling. Ventana Chapter Conservation cochair Gillian Taylor, who is also a member of TOMP, reported the lawsuit was filed after many attempts were made to obtain the information through Public Records Act provisions. The Act is meant to provide governmental accountability through public access to documents covering the conduct of the people's business.

The Chapter is actively engaged in the environmental review of the huge September Ranch project itself, which calls for the removal of 3,582 trees (890 coast live oaks and 2,692 Monterey Pines), involves steep slope alteration and has many unanswered questions about water and traffic impacts. The county approved a slightly different version of the Ranch project in 1998, but after the Chapter and others filed suit, the courts said the project's environmental impact report failed to properly address the all-important water issue. That litigation also led to revelations that the developer's Salinas law firm, Lombardo & Gilles, "ghostwrote" project documents supposedly created by county staff. Monterey attorney Michael Stamp represented the Chapter and the citizen groups in both successful suits.

The water, traffic, and biological impact issues raised by the first September Ranch project haven't gone away. The Carmel Valley Land Use Advisory Committee voted against the project, but formal hearings before the County Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors haven't yet been scheduled.




< back to all issues