Sierra Club
Jump to
Search Ventana Chapter All Sierra Club
Ventana Chapter  
Explore, Enjoy and Protect the Planet  
Home
Home
Politics and Issues
Schedule
Chapter Organization
Join
Resources
Contact Us
National Sierra Club
California Sierra Club
Old Baldy, Canada | photo by Cameron Schaus
Conservation Issues of the Ventana Chapter | chapter wide
WTO rules dolphin-safe tuna a trade violation
The sad demise of dolphin-safe tuna labeling

August 2011

by Joan Jones Holtz, Sierra Club
Responsible Trade Team member

Between 1959 and 1972 millions of dolphins drowned when they became ensnarled in mile-long fishing nets used to catch tuna. Fishers in the Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean, which includes southern California, Mexico, and South America, would deliberately chase schools of dolphin to encircle them in these huge purse seine nets. Since dolphins tend to congregate above schools of tuna, the fishers knew dolphins would lead them to the tuna.

 

Tuna consumers in the U.S. who prefer to buy dolphin-safe tuna will no longer have any means of determining which tuna was caught by dolphin-safe methods.

 

In 1972, in response to an outraged American public who had refused to buy tuna, Congress passed the Marine Mammal Protection Act. That Act prohibited US fishers from using purse seine fishing nets to catch tuna.

In 1988 Congress passed amendments to the Marine Mammal Protection Act which banned tuna imports from countries whose fishers used purse seine nets to catch tuna. Studies had verified that at least three species of dolphin had been severely depleted due to this method of fishing.

In 1990, Congress passed the Dolphin Protection Consumer Information Act and created the popular "dolphin safe" label for cans of tuna. That label could be displayed only on cans which certified that the tuna had not been caught using purse seine fishing nets. Sales for tuna without the "dolphin safe" labels suffered. During this period dolphin deaths dropped dramatically—from 423,678 deaths per year in 1972 to 5,550 per year in 1992.

In 1991, Mexico challenged the U.S. ban on tuna caught in Mexican waters. The Mexican government contended that the provisions in the Marine Mammal Protection Act were not necessary to protect tuna. A GATT (General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade) panel backed them up and ruled that a policy which treats physically-identical goods differently based on their production or method of processing violated GATT rules. GATT rules require agreement of all GATT nations to adopt a new ruling—this time, in regard to dolphin safety. However, both the U.S. and Mexico agreed to drop the matter.

Why did both Mexico and the US decide to stop the controversy? Because the North American Free Trade Agreement was about to be introduced to the U.S. Congress, and its passage was in doubt. Both countries knew that the publicity from the dolphin safety controversy would likely doom NAFTA.

In 1995, soon after the US entered the World Trade Organization (WTO), Mexico again challenged the US Dolphin Protection Consumer Information Act by threatening a WTO enforcement case against the US for refusing to implement the 1991 GATT ruling.

Anxious to be on good terms with our Mexican neighbors and new NAFTA partners, President Bill Clinton promised Mexican President Ernest Zedillo that weakening the dolphin protection standard would be a top priority for his administration. After intensive lobbying by the Clinton Administration, Congress passed the Dolphin Conservation Program Act (DCPA) which permitted imports of tuna from other countries, even those using the purse seine nets for catching tuna.

This new law, DCPA, allowed the newly imported tuna to use the "dolphin safe" label—even if the tuna had been caught with purse seine nets. If monitors stationed on sighting boats did not actually see dolphins killed or injured during the setting of the lines, then that tuna could be labeled "dolphin safe."

The original champions of the Dolphin Consumer Protection Information Act, joined by the Dolphin Safe Fair Trade Coalition, fought against the weakening of the law saying that a monitor on a fishing boat the length of a football field could not possibly monitor all activities surrounding the boat.

In March 1999, President Clinton's Secretary of Commerce Bill Daley (now President Obama's Chief of Staff) determined that there was insufficient evidence that "chase and encirclement" by the tuna purse seine fishing method had any effect on dolphin safety.

On February 2, 2000, the dolphin-safe tuna label regulations were formally changed to allow tuna caught with purse seine nets to carry the dolphin-safe label so long as the monitor on a tuna vessel did not observe dolphins being killed or seriously injured during the netting.

On April 11, 2000, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California rejected the Department of Commerce's attempt to weaken standards on dolphin-safe labeling. This decision was hailed by environmental groups and lawmakers who had worked to establish the dolphin-safe label. They rebuked the Clinton Administration for "selling out" dolphin protections to accommodate a handful of foreign fishing companies.

However, corporate fisher groups have never given up trying to weaken dolphin safety rules. In 2008, Mexico again filed, this time through WTO, a new attack on the Dolphin Protection Consumer Information Act. This new attack alleged that U.S. dolphin protection standards violated the WTO agreement on "Technical Barriers to Trade." The WTO agreement states that "technical regulations are not prepared, adopted, or applied with a view to or with the effect of creating unnecessary obstacles to international trade. Technical regulations shall not be more trade restrictive than necessary."

Public Citizen reported in its blog, "Eyes on Trade," on May 20, 2011 that the U.S. dolphin-safe tuna labeling rule was deemed a WTO violation. Purely voluntary dolphin-safe labeling might impede non-labeled tuna from marketing opportunities in the U.S. Tuna consumers in the U.S. who prefer to buy dolphin-safe tuna will no longer have any means of determining which tuna was caught by dolphin-safe methods.

Is this what "the race to the bottom" is all about? Does U.S. trade policy affect environmental protections? You bet it does!



< back to all issues

In This Section

Current
Humpback whale visit poses eco-ethics questions
December 2011

California leads in fighting oil addiction
October 2011

Plastic bag ban gaining momentum
October 2011

WTO rules dolphin-safe tuna a trade violation
August 2011

WTO may cut US meat labeling
October 2011

Club's Beyond Coal Campaign awarded $50 million
August 2011

Whales store carbon
August 2011

Watershed Dippers
August 2011

Richardson Grove redwoods get reprieve
August 2011

Richardson Grove redwoods threatened by highway widening
June 2011

Resilient Habitats Campaign will address effects of sea level rise
April 2011

Enviros defeat Bohemian Grove logging plan
April 2011

Sierra Club works to phase out coal
April 2011

Protect CEQA and Environmental Laws in the State Budget Process
March 2011

FDA ponders genetically engineered salmon
December 2010

State of the air
December 2010

Antibacterial soap affects fish reproductive behavior
December 2010

State bill would ban single-use plastic bags
August 2010

Atrazine affects fish reproduction
August 2010

New law will protect Americans from formaldehyde
August 2010

Opt out of unwanted phone books
August 2010

You might not be planning for climate change, but the State is
June 2010

Club report explores ending oil dependence
June 2010

American pika
June 2010

Will Commercial Whaling Resume?
May 2010

Our national parks: a vision for the second century
February 2010

Former Yosemite Supervisors call for restoring Hetch Hetchy
December 2009

Assembly resolution puts pressure on Feds to enforce Marine Mammal Act
October 2009

Report proposes sustainable water solutions for California
October 2009

Free online course on Clean Water Act
October 2009

Only 11 states have bottle laws
October 2009

UCSC makes list of “Coolest” Schools
Sierra’s top 20 coolest schools of 2009
October 2009

Farr seeks upgrade of Pinnacles to National Park
October 2009

Fishing rods donated to youth programs
October 2009

State releases climate change adaptation plan
October 2009

State still considering new logging rules
August 2009

Old Growth Redwoods
August 2009

Protected land database now available
August 2009

How much would you save by ditching your gas guzzler?
August 2009

NOAA website provides resources for coastal cities dealing with climate change
August 2009

Stimulus funds to benefit national forests
August 2009

New report shows birds in decline
June 2009

700,000 acres of new wilderness designated in California
June 2009

Researchers map West Coast ocean threats
June 2009

Sierra Club successfully challenges Stockton’s General Plan Update
June 2009

Say NO to bottled water
June 2009

Local residents propose environmental laws
June 2009

Traffic pollution linked to new cases of asthma
June 2009

County Supervisors support net metering
June 2009

Labor and enviros join forces
April 2009

Restore Hetch Hetchy moves HQ to San Francisco
April 2009

Carl Pope to step down
January 2009

Border wall harming wildlife
January 2009

Learning bird behavior turns kids into scientists
January 2009

Air Board warns consumers about air purifiers
January 2009

Green Streets improve water quality
January 2009

State body proposes plastic bag fees
January 2009

Clean coal is a myth
January 2009

Cutting their carbon footprints
January 2009

Carl Pope to step down as Executive Director of Sierra Club
January 2009

Legislation needed to increase amount of renewable energy
December 2008

Recycling alone is not the answer
December 2008

Patented seeds violate farmer's rights
December 2008

Sierra Club organizer mobilizing volunteers against clearcutting
October 2008

PG&E invests in gas, nuclear and hot air
August 2008

Help prepare Sierra Club huts for winter
August 2008

Air Board develops draft plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
August 2008

Eating for a Healthy Planet
May 2008


Global Warming rekindles nuclear power debate
May 2008


Volunteers needed for LeConte Lodge
March 2008


Action Alert!
Tell the Governor to support Zero Emission Vehicles
March 2008


A gift for the Corrizo Plain pronghorn
January 2008


SB 375 would link land use planning and transportation
January 2008


Governor proposes closing state parks & cutting lifeguards
January 2008


Track green-ness of your electricity
December 2007


UC named 4th in Sierra's list of cool schools
December 2007


Clair Tappaan Warming Hut property protected by conservation easement
October 2007


Cutting back on meat can help global warming
October 2007


Disappearing polar bear habitat
October 2007


International trade
August 2007


Green wedding
August 2007


New roles for our National Parks
August 2007


How we reduced our carbon footprint
April 2007


Joyce Stevens turns 80!
February 2007


Sierra Club launches weekly radio show
February 2007


Co-op America's 12-Step Plan for Climate Action
February 2007


A visit with the great California condors
June 2006


Bush administration abandons long-standing protections for critical wildlife habitat on Alaska’s North Slope

Chapter opposes water management scheme for Seaside Aquifer

Chapter and Group events to highlight marine sanctuary

End of an era: Ventana Chapter Bookstore closes

California has opportunities to reduce mercury poisoning

A biting issue

Sanctuary Draft Management Plan due out this summer

Nature Conservancy acquires gateway to Pinnacles National Monument

Elkhorn Slough threatened by subdivisions

Open space preserved on San Mateo County Coast

Greased lightning - Peregrine falcons in California

It’s time to restore Hetch Hetchy

Appeal to deny subdivision near Elkhorn Slough successful

Chapter revises Los Padres National Forest map

Forest geneticists visit Point Lobos

Methyl bromide poisoning devastates farm workers’ health

Resurrect those old Sierra Club cups?

Transit - highway rules unfair

California's oak woodlands need your help!